<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Making Theodicy Properly Eschatological</title>
	<atom:link href="http://unpresentable.wordpress.com/2008/04/17/making-theodicy-properly-eschatological/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://unpresentable.wordpress.com/2008/04/17/making-theodicy-properly-eschatological/</link>
	<description>Witnesses To The Unpresentable</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 18:17:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=MU</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: irishanglican</title>
		<link>http://unpresentable.wordpress.com/2008/04/17/making-theodicy-properly-eschatological/#comment-225</link>
		<dc:creator>irishanglican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 01:41:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unpresentable.wordpress.com/?p=81#comment-225</guid>
		<description>I am Irish and Anglo-Irish, born in Ireland but educated in England.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am Irish and Anglo-Irish, born in Ireland but educated in England.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: irishanglican</title>
		<link>http://unpresentable.wordpress.com/2008/04/17/making-theodicy-properly-eschatological/#comment-224</link>
		<dc:creator>irishanglican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 01:29:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unpresentable.wordpress.com/?p=81#comment-224</guid>
		<description>Here is an American Orthodox statement, but not offical:
The Orthodox Church is evangelical, but not Protestant. It is orthodox, but not Jewish. It is catholic, but not Roman. It is non-denominational - it is pre-denominational...Acts 2:42.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is an American Orthodox statement, but not offical:<br />
The Orthodox Church is evangelical, but not Protestant. It is orthodox, but not Jewish. It is catholic, but not Roman. It is non-denominational - it is pre-denominational&#8230;Acts 2:42.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: irishanglican</title>
		<link>http://unpresentable.wordpress.com/2008/04/17/making-theodicy-properly-eschatological/#comment-223</link>
		<dc:creator>irishanglican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 01:18:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unpresentable.wordpress.com/?p=81#comment-223</guid>
		<description>If you are talking about my posts of Miaphysite and others finally back to Chalcedon? I would see and hold the seven Oecumenical Councils.. Myself at present I would see the position of Miaphysite as an open question, to be seen in the mystery of God Triune. But I have in the past tended to the position of of the classic Chalcedonian. And at present still do.  I have been part of a society for the Anglican-Orthodox dialogue, and stand very close to Orthodoxy. I would follow their full Trinitarian positions also, which are creedal. And I am an Anglican priest.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you are talking about my posts of Miaphysite and others finally back to Chalcedon? I would see and hold the seven Oecumenical Councils.. Myself at present I would see the position of Miaphysite as an open question, to be seen in the mystery of God Triune. But I have in the past tended to the position of of the classic Chalcedonian. And at present still do.  I have been part of a society for the Anglican-Orthodox dialogue, and stand very close to Orthodoxy. I would follow their full Trinitarian positions also, which are creedal. And I am an Anglican priest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troy Polidori</title>
		<link>http://unpresentable.wordpress.com/2008/04/17/making-theodicy-properly-eschatological/#comment-221</link>
		<dc:creator>Troy Polidori</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 May 2008 00:28:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unpresentable.wordpress.com/?p=81#comment-221</guid>
		<description>Can't say that I'm too familiar. May I ask what you think of the recent trends you describe?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t say that I&#8217;m too familiar. May I ask what you think of the recent trends you describe?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: irishanglican</title>
		<link>http://unpresentable.wordpress.com/2008/04/17/making-theodicy-properly-eschatological/#comment-210</link>
		<dc:creator>irishanglican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 23:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unpresentable.wordpress.com/?p=81#comment-210</guid>
		<description>Of course strictly speaking apocatastasis or universalism is not just seen in some Orthodox or Eastern Fathers...Clement of Alexandria and St. Gregory of Nyssa, but even in late Western forms, with Schleiermacher, etc. But I again was thinking about evil and its ontology, or lack with you? If ya are not interested here that is fine mate?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course strictly speaking apocatastasis or universalism is not just seen in some Orthodox or Eastern Fathers&#8230;Clement of Alexandria and St. Gregory of Nyssa, but even in late Western forms, with Schleiermacher, etc. But I again was thinking about evil and its ontology, or lack with you? If ya are not interested here that is fine mate?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: irishanglican</title>
		<link>http://unpresentable.wordpress.com/2008/04/17/making-theodicy-properly-eschatological/#comment-209</link>
		<dc:creator>irishanglican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 22:27:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unpresentable.wordpress.com/?p=81#comment-209</guid>
		<description>Not directly, but it is being renewed today with even some evangelicals. Though mostly in the form of annihilationism. I just wondered how you see evil itself?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not directly, but it is being renewed today with even some evangelicals. Though mostly in the form of annihilationism. I just wondered how you see evil itself?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troy Polidori</title>
		<link>http://unpresentable.wordpress.com/2008/04/17/making-theodicy-properly-eschatological/#comment-207</link>
		<dc:creator>Troy Polidori</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 15:40:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unpresentable.wordpress.com/?p=81#comment-207</guid>
		<description>Are you referring to the negation of evil in the apokatastasis?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you referring to the negation of evil in the apokatastasis?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: irishanglican</title>
		<link>http://unpresentable.wordpress.com/2008/04/17/making-theodicy-properly-eschatological/#comment-200</link>
		<dc:creator>irishanglican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 01:09:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unpresentable.wordpress.com/?p=81#comment-200</guid>
		<description>I don't think you understood my question. The Orthodox have an ontology that sees evil as finally unreal or not lasting, i.e. negation. God's truth and grace overcomes evil with good in the end. Thus evil becomes nothing in the end, it negates itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think you understood my question. The Orthodox have an ontology that sees evil as finally unreal or not lasting, i.e. negation. God&#8217;s truth and grace overcomes evil with good in the end. Thus evil becomes nothing in the end, it negates itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Troy Polidori</title>
		<link>http://unpresentable.wordpress.com/2008/04/17/making-theodicy-properly-eschatological/#comment-199</link>
		<dc:creator>Troy Polidori</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 May 2008 00:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unpresentable.wordpress.com/?p=81#comment-199</guid>
		<description>I'm not a huge fan of negative theology overall, but what exactly are you referring to? Do you have something specific in mind regarding a negative theodicy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not a huge fan of negative theology overall, but what exactly are you referring to? Do you have something specific in mind regarding a negative theodicy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: irishanglican</title>
		<link>http://unpresentable.wordpress.com/2008/04/17/making-theodicy-properly-eschatological/#comment-198</link>
		<dc:creator>irishanglican</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 03:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://unpresentable.wordpress.com/?p=81#comment-198</guid>
		<description>Nicely stated, but what about Orthodoxy, and their idea of negation, etc.?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nicely stated, but what about Orthodoxy, and their idea of negation, etc.?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
